Ruptured pial-pial collateral aneurysm associated with left internal carotid artery occlusion: nuances of surgical management. Illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Carotid occlusion often leads to the formation of a collateral network. On rare occasions, due to hemodynamic influence, aneurysms can occur. Here, the authors describe a 69-year-old male presenting with intracerebral hemorrhage secondary to a ruptured aneurysm within such a network. OBSERVATIONS: The patient presented to the emergency department with an altered level of consciousness. Imaging showed a left temporal lobe hemorrhage extending into the ventricle, subdural hematoma, and evidence of contrast extravasation. Digital subtraction angiography revealed an occluded left internal carotid artery with the left middle cerebral artery territory reconstituted by flow through an external carotid artery-internal carotid artery anastomosis. The latter was formed by the superficial temporal artery-superior orbital artery, as well as pial-pial collaterals from the posterior temporal artery. Notably, a 4-mm aneurysm arising from the pial-pial collateral network was identified. Surgical intervention involved a left temporal craniectomy and aneurysm excision, with special attention paid to preserving the anastomotic flow through the superficial temporal artery. LESSONS: This case underscores the importance of recognizing and preserving collateral vascular pathways in cases of carotid occlusion with an associated aneurysm. It emphasizes the necessary balance between managing aneurysm risk and maintaining cerebral perfusion, highlighting the need for careful preoperative planning and intraoperative caution.

Assessing the research landscape and clinical utility of large language models: a scoping review.

IMPORTANCE: Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT are powerful generative systems that rapidly synthesize natural language responses. Research on LLMs has revealed their potential and pitfalls, especially in clinical settings. However, the evolving landscape of LLM research in medicine has left several gaps regarding their evaluation, application, and evidence base. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to (1) summarize current research evidence on the accuracy and efficacy of LLMs in medical applications, (2) discuss the ethical, legal, logistical, and socioeconomic implications of LLM use in clinical settings, (3) explore barriers and facilitators to LLM implementation in healthcare, (4) propose a standardized evaluation framework for assessing LLMs' clinical utility, and (5) identify evidence gaps and propose future research directions for LLMs in clinical applications. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We screened 4,036 records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv from January 2023 (inception of the search) to June 26, 2023 for English-language papers and analyzed findings from 55 worldwide studies. Quality of evidence was reported based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine recommendations. FINDINGS: Our results demonstrate that LLMs show promise in compiling patient notes, assisting patients in navigating the healthcare system, and to some extent, supporting clinical decision-making when combined with human oversight. However, their utilization is limited by biases in training data that may harm patients, the generation of inaccurate but convincing information, and ethical, legal, socioeconomic, and privacy concerns. We also identified a lack of standardized methods for evaluating LLMs' effectiveness and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This review thus highlights potential future directions and questions to address these limitations and to further explore LLMs' potential in enhancing healthcare delivery.

Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study.

BACKGROUND: The systematic review of clinical research papers is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process that often involves the screening of thousands of titles and abstracts. The accuracy and efficiency of this process are critical for the quality of the review and subsequent health care decisions. Traditional methods rely heavily on human reviewers, often requiring a significant investment of time and resources. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the performance of the OpenAI generative pretrained transformer (GPT) and GPT-4 application programming interfaces (APIs) in accurately and efficiently identifying relevant titles and abstracts from real-world clinical review data sets and comparing their performance against ground truth labeling by 2 independent human reviewers. METHODS: We introduce a novel workflow using the Chat GPT and GPT-4 APIs for screening titles and abstracts in clinical reviews. A Python script was created to make calls to the API with the screening criteria in natural language and a corpus of title and abstract data sets filtered by a minimum of 2 human reviewers. We compared the performance of our model against human-reviewed papers across 6 review papers, screening over 24,000 titles and abstracts. RESULTS: Our results show an accuracy of 0.91, a macro F1-score of 0.60, a sensitivity of excluded papers of 0.91, and a sensitivity of included papers of 0.76. The interrater variability between 2 independent human screeners was κ=0.46, and the prevalence and bias-adjusted κ between our proposed methods and the consensus-based human decisions was κ=0.96. On a randomly selected subset of papers, the GPT models demonstrated the ability to provide reasoning for their decisions and corrected their initial decisions upon being asked to explain their reasoning for incorrect classifications. CONCLUSIONS: Large language models have the potential to streamline the clinical review process, save valuable time and effort for researchers, and contribute to the overall quality of clinical reviews. By prioritizing the workflow and acting as an aid rather than a replacement for researchers and reviewers, models such as GPT-4 can enhance efficiency and lead to more accurate and reliable conclusions in medical research.

Force Profile as Surgeon-Specific Signature.

Objective: To investigate the notion that a surgeon's force profile can be the signature of their identity and performance. Summary background data: Surgeon performance in the operating room is an understudied topic. The advent of deep learning methods paired with a sensorized surgical device presents an opportunity to incorporate quantitative insight into surgical performance and processes. Using a device called the SmartForceps System and through automated analytics, we have previously reported surgeon force profile, surgical skill, and task classification. However, an investigation of whether an individual surgeon can be identified by surgical technique has yet to be studied. Methods: In this study, we investigate multiple neural network architectures to identify the surgeon associated with their time-series tool-tissue forces using bipolar forceps data. The surgeon associated with each 10-second window of force data was labeled, and the data were randomly split into 80% for model training and validation (10% validation) and 20% for testing. Data imbalance was mitigated through subsampling from more populated classes with a random size adjustment based on 0.1% of sample counts in the respective class. An exploratory analysis of force segments was performed to investigate underlying patterns differentiating individual surgical techniques. Results: In a dataset of 2819 ten-second time segments from 89 neurosurgical cases, the best-performing model achieved a micro-average area under the curve of 0.97, a testing F1-score of 0.82, a sensitivity of 82%, and a precision of 82%. This model was a time-series ResNet model to extract features from the time-series data followed by a linearized output into the XGBoost algorithm. Furthermore, we found that convolutional neural networks outperformed long short-term memory networks in performance and speed. Using a weighted average approach, an ensemble model was able to identify an expert surgeon with 83.8% accuracy using a validation dataset. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that each surgeon has a unique force profile amenable to identification using deep learning methods. We anticipate our models will enable a quantitative framework to provide bespoke feedback to surgeons and to track their skill progression longitudinally. Furthermore, the ability to recognize individual surgeons introduces the mechanism of correlating outcome to surgeon performance.